
As mentioned on my blog for class, I discussed Stephen Harper’s foray into YouTube to answer questions put worth from citizens via the web. I would like to re-examine this here, and take a look at how it was received, and whether or not people have deemed it successful.
The YouTube broadcast has been viewed over 200,000 times. This is a substantial amount of people that partook in the event but compared to the population of Canada as a hole, and even compared to the top rated videos on YouTube, it is not a monumental number. Is the engagement of government in social media really working? Are Canadians not aware enough about these events and tools? Or do people not care enough about politics/expect to see their politicians in a more traditional media form, like a television broadcast?
Journalists have found that overall this new attempt at having an “open” forum with the public was successful. The Globe and Mail published a write up on the interview and provided some insightful suggestions on how to improve on this type of governmental media event:
That is the crux of social media being used as a form of democratic/citizen media. People need to be accessible, otherwise the barriers of traditional forms of media still exist.
The YouTube broadcast has been viewed over 200,000 times. This is a substantial amount of people that partook in the event but compared to the population of Canada as a hole, and even compared to the top rated videos on YouTube, it is not a monumental number. Is the engagement of government in social media really working? Are Canadians not aware enough about these events and tools? Or do people not care enough about politics/expect to see their politicians in a more traditional media form, like a television broadcast?
Journalists have found that overall this new attempt at having an “open” forum with the public was successful. The Globe and Mail published a write up on the interview and provided some insightful suggestions on how to improve on this type of governmental media event:
“Be careful of refocusing questions
Re-directing questions does not qualify (when questions get walked around there is not ability for the citizen to respond and bring this up)
Lack of follow-up questions (not a true back and forth conversation)
Pick your interviewer carefully
Ask the most-voted questions
People ask good questions but could do with some advice
Video questions are better than text questions
Share each answer as a small video
Be real. “And that's when social media works best – when we get to see people being human. Otherwise, you just look wooden and, frankly, uninteresting”
That is the crux of social media being used as a form of democratic/citizen media. People need to be accessible, otherwise the barriers of traditional forms of media still exist.
I personally donta watcha d’noose
ReplyDelete(good ‘play-on-words’ for the MSM);
I suggest you do away with yore filthy
TV and start gettn ready for either the
7 year hell-on-earth or being Raptured.
Yet, first, I gotta lotta fun in 7thHeaven
for you if you wannum, miss gorgeous:
GroovyGirly...
Gonna be@Rong Way café in 7thHeaven
doing slap-shtick comedy after I bite-the-
dust ...again (I ‘died’ before).
When I do ‘GameOver’ the Last Time,
I’ll do textbook, Noo-Joisey-axent!
Zealous, 5-star-entertainment!
Saturate yore panacea, wildchild:
start OUR ‘starry-sky-reality’ now!!
⚡️psychopathicmath.blogspot.com⚡️
Cya soon, ya gorgeous wildflower...
(<- skuzze d’Noo Joisey axent, kapiche?)
Delete